13 results in Blogs
AI & LawThe clause that erased a $22,000 liability
A vendor claimed his client owed $22,000 on a contract they never agreed to. Enoch Allotey used Irys to find the clause that killed the claim, and had it rescinded the same day.
Industry InsightsWhy We Believe the Future of Legal AI Is Stateful
Most legal AI rereads your matter from scratch every time. We built Stateful Swarms to read once, remember, and query cheaply — 39x lower cost and stronger results on Harvey’s benchmark.
Industry InsightsThe Real Decision Isn't Harvey vs. Legora vs. Claude.
Harvey and Legora do not publish standard pricing, and most US firms are small. For them the actual choice is Claude on its own versus a legal-native platform. Here is how to think it through.
Industry InsightsWhat Solo Lawyers Should Actually Look for in Legal AI
Legal AI for solo lawyers isn’t the same as enterprise tools. Here’s what actually matters when choosing a legal AI platform.
Industry InsightsWhat Legora’s $100M ARR Means for Small Firm Lawyers
Legal AI is scaling fast, but not always for small firms. Here’s what BigLaw platforms mean for AI for lawyers.
AI & LawThe Handoff Problem: Why Legal Work Gets Worse Every Time a Case Changes Hands
Every case handoff loses context. Here’s why legal work breaks across transitions and how a legal AI platform fixes it.
AI & LawThe Family Law Document Problem: Why Legal AI Must Structure the Record
Most law firm AI tools fail before the work begins. Here’s how legal AI actually handles real case records.
AI & LawCourts Aren’t Regulating AI. They’re Defining Its Conditions.
Legal AI just changed: courts now care how your AI handles data, not what it produces.
AI & LawWhen a Focused Tool Becomes a Ceiling: Spellbook vs. Irys One
Document-level legal AI helps with drafting, but breaks at deal complexity. Why AI for lawyers must move beyond single-document workflows.
AI & LawLegal AI Needs Matter Context, Not Just Chat Sessions
Most legal AI tools rely on chat. But legal reasoning depends on continuity, and continuity depends on matter context. Here’s why chat-based tools fail without it.
AI & LawAuthority Is Not Strategy: How Irys Separates Legal Retrieval from Legal Reasoning
Most legal AI tools conflate finding relevant cases with knowing what to do with them. Irys draws a deliberate architectural boundary between the two. and it changes everything about how lawyers can trust AI in practice.
AI & LawBeyond Prompts: Why Legal AI Must Be Built Around Matters, Not Conversations
Chat interfaces gave us a taste of what AI could do for legal work. But a conversation is not a matter. The next generation of legal AI has to be organized around how lawyers actually work. and that means building around the matter, not the message.
Industry InsightsWrappers Aren't Enough. But Neither Is Raw Frontier AI. Law Needs Infrastructure.
The legal AI market has bifurcated into thin wrappers on general models and raw API access for sophisticated teams. Neither is sufficient. Law needs a purpose-built infrastructure layer. and the firms that understand this earliest will have a durable advantage.
