A plaintiff-side operating system, or a cross-practice legal platform?

Eve does not publish standard pricing. Evaluation is demo-led, and buying starts with a sales conversation. That is a common model for firm-wide platforms, but it means you will not know the number, or what it includes, until you ask.

Irys publishes its prices. Irys One is $299 per month for an individual attorney, with no per-token or per-query overage on the advertised plan. Irys Teams is $329 per seat per month for teams of 2 to 50 attorneys. There is a 7-day trial with no credit card required, so you can evaluate on a real matter before anyone calls you.

If you run a high-volume plaintiff practice, Eve's specialization is a genuine advantage. Its intake automation, medical chronologies, demand packages, and nightly case audits are purpose-built for contingency-fee economics, where case capacity and turnaround speed directly drive revenue. Eve reports significant capacity gains across its customer base, including firms handling multiple times more cases per attorney. Those are Eve's own reported figures, but the product focus behind them is real.

Eve also integrates with plaintiff-oriented case management systems, including Litify, SmartAdvocate, and Clio Grow, plus phone systems such as RingCentral, Zoom Phone, and Dialpad. It is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and states HIPAA compliance, which matters when your matters run on medical records. Irys does not answer your phones or audit your docket overnight. If 24/7 AI intake and automated plaintiff case monitoring are the core requirement, Eve is built for exactly that.

Irys is built for legal work across practice areas and both sides of the caption. The same platform handles plaintiff and defense litigation, transactional work, employment matters, and regulatory questions. If your firm's work extends beyond plaintiff practice, Irys is designed to cover it without a second tool.

The core of the product is matter-centric research and drafting. Irys preserves the structure of a matter so the next task can use the relevant documents, facts, and authorities without rebuilding context in every prompt. Output is source-linked, so you can open the passage behind a statement and check it yourself. A Word add-in brings the work into the document you actually file, and built-in e-signature closes out the paperwork.

Workbench, currently in beta, connects Irys to applications such as Gmail, Google Drive, Calendar, Outlook, OneDrive, and Slack, and takes actions only with your approval. And because Irys pricing is published and the trial is self-service, a single lawyer can start today, at $299 per month, without a procurement cycle.

Do not decide from marketing pages, including this one. Run both products on the same live matter and ask each vendor the same questions.

Can it locate the exact source behind a factual statement in its output?

Can it check whether cited authority is still good law?

Does context carry from one task into the next, or do you rebuild the matter in every prompt?

Can it work across your email, files, research, and Word without manual copying?

Does it produce a usable file, not just chat text?

If your firm handles work outside plaintiff practice, does the platform cover it, or will you need a second tool?

What is excluded from the quoted price, and what happens to the price at renewal?

Choose Eve if you are a plaintiff firm that wants intake, drafting, case auditing, and firm analytics automated around your case management system. Its depth in that vertical is the point of the product.

Choose Irys if you want one platform for research, drafting, and connected work across the practice areas your firm handles, with published pricing, a no-card trial, source-linked output, and finished work product. This comparison reflects each company's public materials reviewed August 3, 2026. Product scope and pricing change, so confirm current terms with each vendor before you buy. Product scope and pricing change, so confirm current terms with each vendor before you buy.