Irys (formerly Iqidis) vs GC AIIrys vs GC AI: two transparently priced legal AI platforms, built for different work
GC AI is purpose-built for in-house legal teams. Irys is built for matter-centric legal work across law firms, solo practitioners, and legal departments. Here is what each publicly offers, and how to test both.
At a glance
Irys and GC AI are both publicly priced legal AI platforms, but GC AI is purpose-built for in-house legal departments while Irys is built around the matter for law firms, solo practitioners, and legal departments alike. GC AI's Individual plan is $500 per month with a 14-day trial; Irys One is $299 per month with a 7-day, no-card trial. Because both companies publish pricing, a direct side-by-side trial is straightforward.
GC AI
Who GC AI is built for
GC AI is purpose-built for in-house legal teams, and it is a serious product.
Its public materials describe legal skills oriented to in-house work, contract review, playbooks, web research, case law access, agents, and Exact Quote, a feature that highlights the precise passage behind an answer so counsel can verify it in the source.
It also connects to the tools legal departments actually live in. GC AI publicly documents more than 20 agent connectors, including Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Google Drive, and HubSpot, and its connectors can retrieve context and take approved actions. Word and Slack integrations are documented as well.
Its customer base is not limited to small teams. GC AI describes customers ranging from solo general counsel to enterprise legal departments, with Team and Enterprise plans that add shared chats, team skills, SSO, onboarding, and enterprise support.
Pricing
Pricing, as published
Both companies publish individual pricing, something most of the major legal AI platforms reviewed for these pages do not do.
Based on public pricing pages reviewed August 3, 2026, GC AI lists its Individual plan at $500 per month with unlimited chats, skills, and Easy Prompt use, and offers a 14-day trial. Two details are worth noting: US Case Law is an add-on at the Individual level, though it is included in Team and Enterprise, and API usage is billed separately in pooled credits.
GC AI's Team plan is annual and priced on request.
Irys One is publicly priced at $299 per month, with no per-token or per-query overage on the advertised plan, and a 7-day trial that requires no credit card. Irys Teams is $329 per seat per month for teams of 2 to 25 attorneys, a published number with no sales call required.
Actual pricing and contract terms can vary. Confirm current terms with each vendor before you buy.
GC AI
What GC AI does better
If your team is a classic in-house legal department, fielding contract review, internal questions, and business-team requests, GC AI's defaults will likely fit your workflow with less configuration.
Its skills and playbooks are designed around how a legal department serves internal clients, in the company's own voice and positions.
Its connector list is broad and business-facing. More than 20 documented connectors, including systems like HubSpot, reflect a product designed to sit inside a company's operational stack, not just a lawyer's document folder.
Exact Quote is a genuinely useful verification feature: it points to the precise underlying passage, not just the document. And GC AI's 14-day trial is twice as long as the Irys trial.
Irys
What Irys does differently
Irys is organized around the matter, not the chat.
Research, drafting, documents, facts, and context live in the matter, so you do not rebuild the file in every new prompt. Later tasks pick up where earlier ones left off.
Legal research and drafting are part of the core product on the advertised Irys One plan, with source-linked output so you can check where a statement came from. On GC AI's published Individual plan, US Case Law is an add-on.
Irys works where the documents get finished. There is a Word add-in for drafting and review, and built-in e-signature for getting documents executed without a separate subscription. Workbench adds connected application actions across tools like Gmail, Drive, Calendar, Outlook, OneDrive, and Slack, and actions require user approval rather than running autonomously.
And Irys is built for legal work across law firms, individual practitioners, and legal departments, with published individual and team pricing on both sides of that spectrum. If your legal team runs disputes, investigations, and regulatory matters like an internal law firm, the matter-based structure is the point.
The infrastructure around the models is Irys's own. Irys runs its own agentic orchestration, structured matter intelligence, and evaluation infrastructure around the models it uses, built to plan and carry multi-step legal work. In Irys's internal evaluations on published legal benchmark tasks, including Harvey's published BigLaw Bench task set (Irys internal testing, July 2026), the Irys system scored above general-purpose frontier-model baselines on legal work. Methodology available on request.
The practical test for any of these platforms is whether the system can carry a matter end to end: plan the work, keep the context, verify the sources, and hand back a finished file. That is the job Irys is built for.
Matter
Test both on the same matter
Comparison pages, including this one, are a starting point.
Both vendors offer trials. The only evaluation that matters is running the same real matter through both products and asking these questions.
Decide
How to decide
Choose GC AI if you run a classic in-house legal department and want a tool whose skills, playbooks, and connectors are tuned to that job from day one.
Choose Irys if your work is matter-based, if you want legal research and drafting included in a published price, and if you want a system built to carry multi-step legal work from plan to finished file.
Both companies publish their individual pricing, and neither asks you to guess. Take advantage of that: run the same matter through both trials and let the work decide.
The Irys offer
One published price. No per-token or per-query overage.
Irys One is $299 per month with unlimited AI queries under the advertised plan, a 7-day trial, and no credit card required.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is Irys better than GC AI?
For a classic in-house legal department handling contract review and internal business requests, GC AI's skills and playbooks are tuned to that job with less setup. For matter-based legal work, disputes, investigations, and multi-step drafting, with source-linked research included by default, Irys is built for that structure. Both are strong products; the fit depends on whether your work looks like an in-house department's daily requests or a matter-based caseload.
How much does GC AI cost compared to Irys?
GC AI publishes its Individual plan at $500 per month with unlimited chats and skills, plus a 14-day trial, though its Team plan is annual and priced on request. Irys One is $299 per month with no per-token or per-query overage on the advertised plan, and Irys Teams is $329 per seat per month for 2 to 25 attorneys, with a 7-day trial requiring no credit card.
Does GC AI include case law research at the same price as Irys?
On GC AI's published Individual plan, US Case Law is a separate add-on, though it is included at the Team and Enterprise levels. On Irys One, legal research and drafting with source-linked output are part of the core $299-per-month plan. Confirm current add-on costs directly with GC AI if case law access at the entry price matters to you.
Is Irys the same product as Iqidis?
Yes. Irys is the rebranded name of Iqidis, effective 2026, with the same company and platform behind it. A comparison of GC AI to Iqidis found elsewhere is describing this same Irys product.
Does GC AI have more integrations than Irys?
GC AI publicly documents more than 20 agent connectors, including business-facing tools like HubSpot, reflecting a product built to sit inside a company's broader operational stack. Irys connects through Workbench to applications including Gmail, Drive, Calendar, Outlook, OneDrive, and Slack, with actions requiring user approval rather than running autonomously.
Should an in-house legal team pick GC AI or Irys?
A department that wants defaults tuned specifically to internal business requests, with a broad connector list into systems like HubSpot, will likely find GC AI fits with less configuration. A department that wants legal research and drafting included in the base price, matter-based context, and connected application actions is better matched to Irys.
Other comparisons
Except where a statement is expressly labeled as Irys internal testing, this comparison is based on publicly available information reviewed on August 19, 2026, and on Irys's current product positioning. “Not publicly listed” means no standard public price or term was found on the vendor's official materials as of that date; actual pricing, features, and contract terms may vary and may require particular plans, content subscriptions, or integrations. Product capabilities on both sides change frequently; confirm current details with each vendor before making a purchasing decision. GC AI and all other product names are trademarks of their respective owners. Their use here is for identification and comparison only and does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, their owners. This page is informational and is not legal, financial, or purchasing advice.
Ready to see Irys in action?
Book a demo and see how Irys connects drafting, research, and matter context into one platform.