The verification taxStop babysitting your AI.

Checking what the chat gives you

You ask a general purpose AI chat, say ChatGPT, for a case on point.

It hands back a citation and a quote, formatted the way a real one would be.

You cannot tell from the page alone whether it holds up, so you pull the case yourself and read it against what the chat claimed.

Next week, on the next question, you pull the next case and read it again.

Checking what a paid tool gives you

You run the same question through a legal AI tool instead, hoping the citation arrives pre-checked.

Legal AI tools still return an incorrect or unsupported authority often enough that you cannot skip the read.

So you open the case anyway and confirm it says what the tool claims.

Each citation, from either tool, ends up back on your desk before it goes anywhere.

Checking what the chat gives you, down to minutes

Cite Check checks the citations in your draft against available legal sources and surfaces what it finds, for your review.

You open and read the ones flagged, in minutes, instead of pulling and reading each case yourself the way you did with the chat.

Checking what a paid tool gives you, without doubling the work

Cite Check runs the same check against available legal sources whether the citation came from a legal AI tool or your own research.

You read the flagged ones and move on, instead of re-verifying the whole draft by hand.