School AI policy
University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
What University of California, Los Angeles School of Law has published about AI use in coursework, from the school's own documents, checked Sept '26.
What the school says
The published policy
UCLA Law's Academic Standards and Related Procedures state that students who submit written work drafted or edited by an AI content generator (naming ChatGPT, Bing AI Chatbot, and Bard as examples) without prior, explicit instructor approval are subject to discipline under the UCLA Student Conduct Code. Where an instructor does approve AI use, the policy requires the student to disclose the AI tool used and the prompts that produced the content.
From the school’s own document: “without the prior and explicit approval by the instructor”
AI disclosure on submitted work: Permitted with disclosure under the documents reviewed.
Policy source
The school’s policy pageHonor code
The school’s honor codeAfter graduation
Your state bar has its own rules
School policy governs coursework. The moment you practice, your state bar's position on AI takes over.
Read your state's AI rules for lawyers, and before you build any AI habit, learn the concepts that make AI use defensible.
This page states only what University of California, Los Angeles School of Law’s own published documents said when checked in Sept '26; schools revise these documents, sometimes at the same URL, so confirm the current version before relying on it. This is informational research, not legal or academic advice; the school’s current honor code and your professors’ instructions control. To correct this page, contact us with the school’s current document.
Build habits now, get hired faster
The habits these policies govern are free to build. When you're ready for a tool that keeps them going after graduation, Irys has a student plan.