Skip to main content

Irys for Word is here. Install Free →

AI rules by state · VA

AI Rules for Lawyers in Virginia 2026

By Sabih Siddiqi, founder of Irys and former BigLaw litigatorVerified as of June 2026
AI disclosure required?
No
Sanctions on record
None on record
Competence rule
Rule 1.1
AI / technology CLE
No tech or AI requirement

Quick answer

Virginia does not require lawyers to disclose AI use. Its legal ethics opinion on generative AI, approved by the Supreme Court of Virginia in late 2025, addresses how AI-driven efficiency affects reasonable fees rather than disclosure. The general duties of competence and candor still require a lawyer to verify AI output before relying on it.

Ethics guidance

Virginia Legal Ethics Opinion 1901

Approved by the Supreme Court of Virginia, November 2025

Virginia's guidance is Legal Ethics Opinion 1901, 'Reasonable Fees and the Use of Generative AI,' approved by the Supreme Court of Virginia in November 2025.

The opinion is narrower than guidance in some other states. It addresses how the time savings from generative AI bear on the reasonableness of fees under the fee rule, and on how lawyers communicate fees to clients. It does not create an AI-disclosure duty. The broader duties of competence, confidentiality, and candor continue to govern a lawyer's use of AI.

Source: Virginia State Bar, Legal Ethics Opinion 1901 (PDF)

Disclosure rules

Are Virginia lawyers required to disclose AI use?

Virginia has no rule requiring lawyers to disclose AI use to a court or a client. Legal Ethics Opinion 1901 addresses fees rather than disclosure, and no statewide court rule mandates AI disclosure in filings.

Counsel should review the assigned judge's standing order in each matter, since individual courts may set their own expectations.

Source: Virginia State Bar, Legal Ethics Opinion 1901 (PDF)

Sanctions on record

AI hallucination sanctions in Virginia

No Virginia state-court AI-hallucination sanction is on record as of June 2026. The duty to verify AI output applies regardless, and filing fabricated citations would expose a lawyer to the same sanctions risk seen in other states.

Competence duty

The competence rule and AI (Rule 1.1)

The competence duty in Virginia is Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1. Virginia's ethics guidance on AI focuses on fees, but the competence and candor duties apply to AI work, requiring a lawyer to understand a tool's limits and verify its output before relying on it.

Source: Virginia State Bar, Legal Ethics Opinion 1901 (PDF)

CLE requirements

Continuing legal education in Virginia

Virginia requires 12 CLE hours each year, including at least 2 hours of ethics. There is no AI or technology-specific CLE requirement as of June 2026, though AI programs can count toward the general requirement.

Source: Virginia State Bar, MCLE requirements

How to stay compliant

A practical checklist for Virginia lawyers

Virginia's AI opinion is about billing rather than disclosure, so the duties that matter day to day are competence and verification under the general rules.

Review the assigned judge's standing order and the court's local rules at the start of every matter. AI disclosure obligations generally sit at the court and judge level rather than in a single statewide rule.

Verify every citation and quotation before filing, and read the underlying authority. Most AI sanctions have resulted from citations the lawyer never personally verified.

Do not enter confidential client information into public AI tools without confirming how the tool handles data and, where there is material confidentiality risk, obtaining the client's informed consent.

Inform the client when AI use materially affects the matter, and honor any client instruction that limits AI use.

Bill only for time actually spent drafting prompts and reviewing output, not for time the tool saved.

Keep any required technology or AI continuing-education credit current, and treat AI competence as part of your duty under the competence rule.

When evaluating tools, look for citation grounding that ties output to verifiable authority, a vendor commitment not to train on client data, and audit trails. These reduce risk, but they do not replace the lawyer's own review.

Frequently asked

Virginia AI rules: common questions

No. Virginia has no rule requiring disclosure of AI use to a court or a client. Legal Ethics Opinion 1901 addresses the effect of AI on reasonable fees, not disclosure, and no statewide court rule mandates AI disclosure in filings.

Legal Ethics Opinion 1901, approved by the Supreme Court of Virginia in November 2025, addresses how the time savings from generative AI affect the reasonableness of fees and how lawyers communicate fees to clients. It does not create an AI-disclosure duty.

No Virginia state-court sanction is on record as of June 2026. The duty to verify AI output still applies, and filing fabricated citations would expose a lawyer to the same sanctions risk seen in other states.

Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1. Virginia's AI opinion focuses on fees, but the competence and candor duties apply to AI work, requiring a lawyer to understand a tool's limits and verify its output.

No. Virginia requires 12 CLE hours per year, including 2 ethics hours. There is no AI-specific requirement, though AI programs can count toward the total.

This page is general information, not legal advice. Rules change, and the obligations that apply to your matter depend on your court, your judge, and your facts. Verify the current rules with the Virginia state bar and the assigned court before you rely on anything here. Last verified June 2026.

Built for lawyers who have to verify everything

Irys grounds its output in verifiable authority, keeps client data out of training, and maintains a record of the work. See how it fits your practice.

Book a Demo