AI rules by state · UT
AI Rules for Lawyers in Utah 2026
- AI disclosure required?
- Case-by-case
- Governing guidance
- Utah State Bar AI opinion (2024)
- Sanctions on record
- Garner v. Kadince (2025), fees + $1,000
- Competence rule
- Rule 1.1
- AI / technology CLE
- No tech or AI requirement
Quick answer
Utah does not require lawyers to disclose AI use as a blanket rule, though the Utah State Bar recommends disclosure to clients and courts and informed consent where appropriate. The Utah Court of Appeals has sanctioned lawyers for filing AI-fabricated citations, so verification is essential.
Ethics guidance
Utah State Bar, Ethics Advisory Opinion on Generative AI
2024
Utah's reference point is the Utah State Bar's ethics advisory opinion on generative AI, issued in 2024.
The opinion applies existing duties to AI. It recommends that lawyers consider disclosing AI use to clients and courts and obtain informed consent where appropriate, and it requires verification of AI output and protection of client confidentiality.
Disclosure rules
Are Utah lawyers required to disclose AI use?
Utah does not impose a blanket disclosure mandate, but its bar guidance recommends disclosing AI use to clients and courts and obtaining informed consent where appropriate. Individual courts may set their own requirements.
Counsel should review the assigned judge's standing order in each matter.
Sanctions on record
AI hallucination sanctions in Utah
Utah has a sanction on record. In Garner v. Kadince (2025 UT App 80), the Utah Court of Appeals sanctioned attorneys who cited nonexistent AI-generated cases, ordering them to pay opposing fees, refund their client, and pay $1,000 to a legal-aid nonprofit. It was the first Utah court to address AI-fabricated citations.
Source: Utah attorneys sanctioned for AI-fabricated brief (Deseret News)
Competence duty
The competence rule and AI (Rule 1.1)
The competence duty in Utah is Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1, with Comment 8 on the benefits and risks of relevant technology. The bar's AI opinion reads this to require understanding a tool and verifying its output.
CLE requirements
Continuing legal education in Utah
Utah requires 12 CLE hours each year, including ethics and professionalism credit. There is no AI or technology-specific requirement as of June 2026.
Source: Utah State Bar, MCLE rules
How to stay compliant
A practical checklist for Utah lawyers
Utah's appellate court has already sanctioned AI-fabricated citations, so verifying every cited case is the duty to take most seriously here.
Review the assigned judge's standing order and the court's local rules at the start of every matter. AI disclosure obligations generally sit at the court and judge level rather than in a single statewide rule.
Verify every citation and quotation before filing, and read the underlying authority. Most AI sanctions have resulted from citations the lawyer never personally verified.
Do not enter confidential client information into public AI tools without confirming how the tool handles data and, where there is material confidentiality risk, obtaining the client's informed consent.
Inform the client when AI use materially affects the matter, and honor any client instruction that limits AI use.
Bill only for time actually spent drafting prompts and reviewing output, not for time the tool saved.
Keep any required technology or AI continuing-education credit current, and treat AI competence as part of your duty under the competence rule.
When evaluating tools, look for citation grounding that ties output to verifiable authority, a vendor commitment not to train on client data, and audit trails. These reduce risk, but they do not replace the lawyer's own review.
Frequently asked
Utah AI rules: common questions
Legal AI rules in nearby states
Practising across state lines? Compare Utah’s rules with its neighbors.
This page is general information, not legal advice. Rules change, and the obligations that apply to your matter depend on your court, your judge, and your facts. Verify the current rules with the Utah state bar and the assigned court before you rely on anything here. Last verified June 2026.
Built for lawyers who have to verify everything
Irys grounds its output in verifiable authority, keeps client data out of training, and maintains a record of the work. See how it fits your practice.
Book a Demo